Field Notes: The Ghost in the Hallway

A Problem With No Name

Sometimes the hardest part of an investigation isn’t following someone, it’s figuring out who they are in the first place.

A family reached out because their teenage daughter had a problem. A boy had taken an interest in her, intense interest. They’d met through a loose circle of friends, nothing formal, and suddenly he was popping up at the church youth group. He wasn’t in her school, wasn’t in their neighborhood, didn’t have a recognizable last name. Nobody seemed to know who he really was.

When Parents Hit a Wall

At first, the parents did what most parents would do. They asked around. They called a couple other parents. They checked Facebook, Instagram, maybe a little light Google work. Nothing. The kid was a ghost. Which, for a teenager in 2025, is a red flag all by itself.

So they called me.

Why Call an Investigator?

Now, people sometimes ask: is it weird, even unethical, to investigate a kid? It’s a fair question. But the answer is this: I don’t pry into teenagers’ lives just for curiosity’s sake. I get called when there’s a safety issue, and safety trumps everything else. If a stranger keeps showing up in your daughter’s orbit, and you don’t know who he is, that’s not just teenage drama, that’s a vulnerability.

The Observation

The first step was simple observation. I showed up at one of the student worship nights. Sat in the back, blended in. I watched the kids come and go, and sure enough, there he was. Tall, wiry, nervous energy. He kept hovering near the daughter, but not with any of the established friend groups. That told me a lot. At one point I saw him catch her alone in a hallway and intentionally bump into her, trying to turn it into an interaction. It was subtle, but it set off alarms.

Following the Trail

From there, it was just a matter of working the edges. He walked in with two other boys who looked like brothers. They drove off in an older model Toyota. That was enough.

Surveillance 101: license plate, check. Plate led to an address, which led to a family name. From there it was building the profile, school, age, parents, the whole picture. Took about 48 hours.

Clarity, Not Guesswork

Turns out the boy wasn’t the monster the family feared. He was seventeen, lived about twenty minutes away, no criminal history, no restraining orders. Just socially awkward, intense, and without much in the way of boundaries. Which can be dangerous in its own right.

And here’s where having me made the difference. If the parents had tried to push this on their own, they would have been stuck in the guessing game—half rumors, half hunches. That’s dangerous territory, because if you confront someone without proof, you don’t just risk embarrassment, you risk escalation. Instead, they got the one thing they needed most: clarity. A name, a history, and a plan for what to do next.

I passed everything back to the parents, along with some practical advice: document everything, set firm boundaries, and if he escalated, call me back and we’d tighten things up with legal remedies.

The funny thing about cases like this is that the parents already knew what they needed to do. They just needed the facts. Once you know who someone is, the fear goes down and the options go up. That’s usually the job.

The Lesson

In the end, the daughter moved on, the boy got the message, and the parents slept easier.

The lesson? When it comes to your kids, don’t ignore that gut feeling that something isn’t right. You don’t need to know everything, but you do need to know enough. Sometimes that’s the difference between living in fear and taking back control.

Previous
Previous

Field Notes: Building a Boat to Sail Away

Next
Next

Field Notes: Protection in Stockholm